Malthus' Essay on Population and the American Debate over Slavery
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Essay: The Cuvier-Geoffroy Debate
1. The Debate: Conceptual Themes 2. Function vs. Form: Rational Principles, Taxonomy, & Comparative Anatomy 3. Functional Anatomy vs. Philosophical Anatomy: Scientific Explanation in Comparative Anatomy 4. Observation vs. Hypothesis: The Role of Induction in 19th Century Science 5. Limited Variation (within embranchements [3]) vs. Teratological Evolution 6. After the Debate: Reinterpretations i...
متن کاملThe Debate over the Ordo Salutis in American Reformed Theology
Some of the newest contenders for orthodoxy in Christian theology have come from a distinct approach called the New Perspective on Paul (NPP). Coming beside the NPP—though not agreeing in entirety—is the development of the Federal Vision (FV). Believing they have found emphases in Scripture that have been long neglected, these groups have sought to redefine Paul’s theology of salvation. Specifi...
متن کاملMalthus and Climate Change: Betting on a Stable Population
A standard assumption in integrated assessment models of climate change is that population and productivity are growing, but at a decreasing rate. We explore the signi cance of the assumption of population and productivity growth for greenhouse gas abatement. After all, there has been no long run slow down in the growth of productivity over the past few centuries, and the rate of population gro...
متن کاملThe Political Legacy of American Slavery
We show that contemporary differences in political attitudes across counties in the American South in part trace their origins to slavery’s prevalence more than 150 years ago. Whites who currently live in Southern counties that had high shares of slaves in 1860 are more likely to identify as a Republican, oppose affirmative action, and express racial resentment and colder feelings toward blacks...
متن کاملREVIEW ESSAY American biofutures: ideology and utopia in the Fukuyama/Stock debate
Francis Fukuyama, in his Our Posthuman Future, and Gregory Stock, in his Redesigning Humans, present competing versions of the biomedical future of human beings, and debate the merits of more or less stringent regimes of regulation for biomedical innovation. In this article, these positions are shown to depend on a shared discourse of market liberalism, which limits both the range of ends for s...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Comparative Studies in Society and History
سال: 2009
ISSN: 0010-4175,1475-2999
DOI: 10.1017/s0010417509990120